University of Wisconsin–Madison

'American Electric Power' Leaves Open Many Questions for Climate Litigation

Type Policy Brief or Report
Year 2011
Level Other Boards and Agencies
State(s) All States
Policy Areas Democracy & Governance, Environment & Natural Resources
This article explains this Supreme Court decision which ruled that federal common law nuisance claims could not proceed because the EPA possesses ultimate authority on the regulation of carbon-dioxide emissions from power plants. From this decision, the author describes various questions that were left unanswered, including whether the Clean Air Act preempts state public nuisance litigation over GHGs or not, and if the Supreme Court's decision bars all federal common law nuisance claims, or only those that sought injunctive relief.

Remove Entry

Are you sure you want to remove this?

There was an error communicating with the server.

Please try again later.

There was an error while saving your data.

Please try again later.

Error

Please try again later.

Update Page Content

You are leaving the page

Please make sure you saved all of the modules to avoid losing any data.